
Il Principe
3.84
384,546 valutazioni·16,173 recensioni
Machiavelli deve essere considerato per quello che era realmente. Può Machiavelli, che fa le seguenti osservazioni, essere machiavellico nel senso dispregiativo del termine? 1. Per conoscere la natura di un popolo, bisogna essere principe, e per conoscere quella del principe, bisogna essere del popo...
- pagine
- 144
- Format
- Paperback
- Pubblicato
- 2014-07-13
- Editore
- Dante University Press
- ISBN
- 9780937832387
Sull'autore

Niccolò Machiavelli
182 libri · 0 follower
The Prince, book ofNiccolò Machiavelli, Italian political theorist, in1513 describes an indifferent ruler to moral considerations with determination to achieve and to maintain power.Niccolò di Bernardo dei Machiavelli, a philosopher, musician, and poet, wrote plays. He figured centrally in component of the Renaissance,...
Ai lettori è piaciuto anche

Manifesto sulla Dipendenza
Jerry Weaver

Bibbia di Studio Life Application: NIV
Anonymous

Il Destino del Giorno: La Guerra per l'America, da Fort Ticonderoga a Charleston, 1777-1780 (Trilogia della Rivoluzione, Vol. 2)
Rick Atkinson

La Sacra Bibbia: Nuova Versione Internazionale
Anonymous

J.R.R. Tolkien: Lo Hobbit e Il Signore degli Anelli (Cofanetto 4 Volumi)
J.R.R. Tolkien

Un Giorno, Tutti Si Saranno Sempre Opposti a Questo
Omar El Akkad
Valutazione e Recensione
What do you think?
Recensioni della comunità
16,173 recensioni3.8
384,546 valutazioni
5
45%
4
30%
3
15%
2
7%
1
3%
Luís·5 years ago
Machiavelli considers that human desires and states of spirit are always the same. Thus, he studies the past and seeks explanations for the reality of his time in history. The account can predict future events and use the same old ways or fail, creating other forms of action. Machiavelli asserted that selfish interests drive all men with no particular personal ambition and material prosperity at any cost—homo hominis lupus (The man is the wolf of the man). Deprivations lead man to work and to as...
Michelle·6 years ago
So, it seems there has been a bit of a mix up.
I had no idea what this was about, I just assumed I was going to read a fairly raucous fictional story about a Prince. So you can imagine my shock when I read the opening chapter.
I feel bad for giving this a one star as this is entirely my fault however it meets all the criteria, I had to drag myself through, I understood little and the only satisfaction I received was reaching the end.
Sorry Machiavelli.
I had no idea what this was about, I just assumed I was going to read a fairly raucous fictional story about a Prince. So you can imagine my shock when I read the opening chapter.
I feel bad for giving this a one star as this is entirely my fault however it meets all the criteria, I had to drag myself through, I understood little and the only satisfaction I received was reaching the end.
Sorry Machiavelli.
Henry Avila·9 years ago
Italy in the early 1500's was a sad, dispirited land of constant wars, deaths, destruction, political betrayals, schemes of conquest by greedy aristocrats, trying to enlarge their petty Italian states, invasion by ruthless, foreign troops, from France, Spain, the Swiss, rulers being overthrown and killed, armies continuously marching, towns sacked, fires blazing, black smoke poring into the sky , mercenary soldiers, slaughtering the innocent, pestilence spreading, only the wise, the strong and t...
Sidharth Vardhan·9 years ago
I don't know how come I never reviewed this one but recently I was visiting this friend of mine in south India, Pramod (yes, the one from Goodreads), when he showed me this not-so-popular smaller piece, allegedly written by the author in his last days, 'Le Gente' and never published - for common people about how they can succeed in social life using diplomacy. There were only twenty copies of same written in 19th century, of which Pramod's was one. Since he is a sort of book-worshipper, he won't...
فؤاد·10 years ago
کتاب درمانی به کسایی که به تحلیل سیاسی علاقه دارن.و خصوصاً به کسایی که آرمانگرا هستن یا تصور ساده ای از عرصه ی سیاست دارن و از پیچیدگی ها و غموضش بی اطلاعن. ماکیاولی نیکولو ماکیاولی (١٤٦٩-١٥٢٧)، از بزرگ ترین اندیشمندان سیاسی اواخر قرون وسطا و اوایل رنسانس، به خاطر سه نظریه ش معروفه:نخست، معیار مشروعیت حکومت، قدرت است. "عقل نمی پذیرد که شخص مسلّح با میل و رضای خود از شخص غیر مسلّح اطاعت کند."دوم، هدف وسیله را توجیه می کند. "شهریار عاقل نباید از اتصاف به ظلم بترسد، وقتی که به وسیله ی آن می تواند ن...
Flo·12 years ago
This is no Little Prince, that's for sure. You must kill the fox, burn the rose, murder the businessman, if any of them tries to take control over your princedom. There's no time to be nice! There's only time to seem to be nice. At the end of the day, it is better to be feared than loved, if you can't be both. Nevertheless, keep in mind chapter 23.The Prince was written in the 16th century and a couple of its ideas are too contemporary. It is a major treatise that influenced several political le...
هدى يحيى·13 years ago
أعطيتُ الكتاب 3 نجوم لكثيرٍ من الأسباب فمع إختلافي مع غالبية آراءه إلا أنني أرى ميكافيللي رجلاً شديد الذكاء ويحب وطنه إيطاليا بطريقته الخاصةكما أنه يسمِّي الأشياء بمسمياتها وهذا ما يجعله شريفا في نظري أتفق مع ميكافيللي في رؤيته للحياة والبشر فهو "وكما جاء في مقدمة الكتاب" كان يقول أحياناًإنه لم يكن ليقدّم بعض ما قدمه من أقوال مريرة ساخرة لو أنَّ البشر كانوا عازفين عن الشر، ولو لم يكن بعضهم في أسفل سافلينفيقول ميكافيللي "يجب على الحاكم العاقل ألا يحفظ عهدا يكون الوفاء به ضد مصلحته ،إن هذا المبدأ ...
Hossam·15 years ago
لا خلاف علي أن الكتاب صادم للغاية، عبر فيه ميكيافيللي عن أراء وأفكار سياسية تتعارض مع الكثير من المبادئ والأخلاق، نبعت فيه مواقفة من قاعدة هو من أرسى مبادئها "الغاية تبرر الوسيلة"، حيث كل شئ مباح للحكام والأمراء سعياً وراء ما أتفقت عليه رغبات البشر من نجاح وسيطرة وحكم، ففي سبيل ذلك يحق للحاكم أن يكذب وينقض عهده وينافق ويمكر لشعبه وينقلب علي من مد له يد العون وأن يغش ويخدع، ويصبح كل ذلك محمود بل ولا غني عنه للوصول للحكم والنجاح فيه.شخصياً،أفترضت خطأ أفكاره بحجة أن حكام أمثال عمر بن الخطاب وعمر بن...
Sasha·15 years ago
I'm weirdly pleased that The Prince lives up to its reputation: it is indeed Machiavellian. Here's his advice on conquering self-governing states (i.e. democracies): "The only way to hold on to such a state is to reduce it to rubble." Well then.I'd like to say that any guy whose last name becomes a synonym for evil is a badass, but Machiavelli wasn't; he was a failed minor diplomat who wrote this in a failed attempt to get reemployed. Stupid attempt, too; anyone who hired him would be advertisin...
Stephen·17 years ago
That single statement boys and girls is the crux at the heart of the matter resting at the bottom-line of Niccolo Machiavelli’s world-changing classic on the defining use of realpolitik in governance and foreign policy. Despite popular perception, Machiavelli, whose name has often been used as a synonym for political ASSHATery, was not arguing that it’s better to be immoral, cruel and evil than to be moral, just and good. Rather, Machiavelli was demonstrating, through reasoned analysis based...