
La Santa Biblia: Versión Reina-Valera
4.45
319,684 valoraciones·9,824 reseñas
La Biblia Reina-Valera es una traducción clásica de la Biblia al español, apreciada por su belleza y fidelidad a los textos originales. Contiene el Antiguo Testamento, el Nuevo Testamento y, en algunas ediciones, los libros deuterocanónicos.
- páginas
- 1590
- Format
- Hardcover
- Publicado
- 2008-01-15
A los lectores también les gustó

Manifiesto de la Adicción: Un Camino Hacia la Recuperación
Jerry Weaver

Biblia de Estudio Aplicación a la Vida NVI
Anonymous

El Destino del Día: La Guerra por América, Fuerte Ticonderoga a Charleston, 1777-1780 (Trilogía de la Revolución, #2)
Rick Atkinson

Santa Biblia, Nueva Versión Internacional
Anonymous

J.R.R. Tolkien: El Hobbit y El Señor de los Anillos (Pack 4 Libros)
J.R.R. Tolkien

Un Día, Todos Siempre Habrán Estado En Contra de Esto
Omar El Akkad
Calificación y Reseña
What do you think?
Reseñas de la comunidad
9,824 reseñas4.5
319,684 valoraciones
5
45%
4
30%
3
15%
2
7%
1
3%
A
André·12 years ago
For anyone looking for a more realistic plot, there is Greek Mythology.
Worthless Bum·17 years ago
Use as toilet paper if you run out.
D
Dina·17 years ago
If you're a fan of Greek mythology, this one's for you. A penchant for fiery places, gnashing of teeth, the number 666, miracle-working zombies, and utter disdain for homosexuals and feminism are helpful, but not required.
**Spoiler alert**
He dies in the end.
**Spoiler alert**
He dies in the end.
E
Eugene·17 years ago
"by Anonymous"
i wouldn't want to take credit for this either.
i wouldn't want to take credit for this either.
Wesson Renick·17 years ago
Certainly not life changing or anything. The plot was hard to follow and the editing was horrible. The characters were painfully one-dimensional and this Jesus guy delivered some of the worst dialogue I've ever read. All in all I found it too long and it took itself way too seriously. The fact that it sells so well is beyond me and the way people hold it up you'd think God himself had written the damn thing.
Jeff Menter·17 years ago
God's first foray into the world of literature has made quite a splash. People the world over are talking about this book (or series of books if you want to get pedantic) and for good reason; It makes some grandiose claims, it purports to be the complete authority on almost all areas of human endeavor (aside from how to choose an internet service provider), and even makes threats to the reader.Of course, English is not God's native tongue and this book has been translated from the original arama...
Max·18 years ago
As a work of fiction it's laughably bad and poorly conceived. Giant logical fallacies, poor character development, and all the plots are scuttled by a magical, invisible entity that's petty, cruel, tyrannical, and amoral. There is no central narrative that is worthwhile (or even believable), and each of the chapters seem written by committee rather than a singular voice. Clearly the book was so bad to begin with a team of editors had to step in and make major changes - which means no part of thi...
Jessica·18 years ago
The Holy, Inspired and inerrant word of God! I can say no more than READ IT! I believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds; God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God; begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father, by whom all things were made. Who, for us men for our salvation, came down from heaven, and was inc...
Dennis·18 years ago
Badly edited, poor continuity and internal consistency. Authors seem to change between books. Plot is cliched and thin, with virtually no character development save for Judas Iscariot. The main characters of Jesus and Moses are entirely one dimensional messianic figures. The novel opens with Adam and Eve, and then ignores them for the next thousand pages or so. The built-in bookmark was a nice touch, but a little pretentious.
Oddly, it wasn't shelved with the other fiction books.
Oddly, it wasn't shelved with the other fiction books.
J.G. Keely·18 years ago
I usually like historical fiction, but this particular example has been so mitigated by the poorly-hidden didactic tautology of its too-many-cooks legion of anonymous authors and editors that it was rather difficult to enjoy. It also fell into a similar trap to the somewhat similar 'Da Vinci Code', in that it utilized a lot of poorly-researched materials and claimed them as fact. A lot of the data matched up poorly with other historical accounts, especially when it came to numerical data. It see...